Automated Bid Analysis for Construction, Industry, and Materials

Upload tender submissions and receive a structured bid analysis with extracted requirements and deviation flags, so you can focus on the decision, not the paperwork.

85%
Review time saved
300+
Requirements mapped
12
Bid risks surfaced
Meet Sophia

Find the hidden risks, surface them to your team, make the best decision.

Sophia is the bid-analysis AI that reads every tender, spec, and submission you upload — tracing each obligation back to its source and surfacing the risks a manual review would miss, across every document in the project.

Sophia reading through documents and surfacing risks
Throw it all in

Save time — Sophia reads every document, in any format.

Tenders, specs, drawings, spreadsheets, emails, scanned PDFs — drop the whole bid pack in and Sophia reads all of it, images and scans included via OCR. No reformatting, no sorting, no copy-paste.

  • PDF
  • Word
  • Excel
  • PowerPoint
  • RTF
  • Email
  • ZIP
  • Images & scans

See the whole picture

Manually reviewing documents and generic AI tools miss answers or quietly drop the requirements that decide the bid. Tender review is too high-stakes for either failure mode — so we built something to fix it.

Other tools
  • Hallucinate clauses that aren't in the document
  • Summarise away the obligations that actually decide the award
  • Leave you re-reading every page to verify the output
  • Lock-in contracts, seat licences, and annual minimums
nanosophia
  • Every obligation traces back to a verbatim source quote
  • Nothing is dropped — silence and contradictions are flagged, not skipped
  • You spend your time deciding, not double-checking the AI
  • Pay-as-you-go, no lock-in — export your data and walk away anytime
Angles on a bid

Bid comparison, surfaced risks, and compliance.

City Square · bidder comparison
Bid comparisonRisksDocuments check
ABC Constructionno issues
DEF Builders3 issues
GHI Group4 issues
Substructure · Piling
Install 600 mm CFA piles to 22 m depth
SUB-02
included£142,500

600 mm CFA piles to full 22 m depth, schedule attached.

included£138,200

Matches spec; sequencing slips by 2 weeks but within programme.

partial£121,000

18 m piles in lieu of 22 m — depth qualified.

Frame · Structural steelwork
Erect structural steel frame to grade S355
FRM-01
included£286,000

S355 throughout, fabrication schedule and connections attached.

partial£262,400

S355 primary members but S275 to secondaries — qualification noted.

includedno price

Narrative compliant but steelwork omitted from the priced bill.

Envelope · Curtain walling
Provide unitised curtain walling to north elevation
ENV-04
included£198,750

Schüco USC65 unitised system to north elevation; thermal report attached.

left outno price

No curtain walling system described in the submission.

partial£162,000

Stick system offered in lieu of unitised — system type qualified.

M&E · Heating plant
Provide air-source heat pump rated ≥ 12 kW
M.E-07
included£24,500

Mitsubishi Ecodan PUZ-WM112 (14 kW) on plant schedule.

included£22,800

Daikin Altherma 3 (16 kW) — exceeds rating.

partial£21,400

10 kW heat pump proposed — below the 12 kW minimum.

External works · Drainage
Install SuDS attenuation tank, capacity ≥ 50 m³
EXT-03
included£18,400

Polystorm crate system, 60 m³ capacity, drawings issued.

left outno price

No mention of attenuation tank or SuDS in the submission.

partial£12,600

35 m³ tank offered — short of the 50 m³ minimum.

Total
across 5 scope items
£670,150all 5 priced
£423,4002 items unpriced
£317,0001 item unpriced
🇬🇧Privacy first

Every document stays in your own private, UK-hosted database — isolated to your team, encrypted at rest, and never used to train a model.

By the people who know the work

Beautifully crafted

Built by estimators, QSs, and engineers who have lived inside ITT packs and tender returns for years. Every interaction is shaped by what real bid teams actually do at 9pm on a deadline — not by a generic AI workflow.